OUR OWN JUSTICE

Tribute to other children who like Baby Peter were gone too soon

2010-08-20T09:08:00.000-07:00

Publisher's Note: This blog was first created to honour the memory of Peter Connelly [Baby Peter] while in the midst of a large media coverage on the terrible tragedy. Through the passage of time and while researching the subject of child abuse, abundant information was found plus details on specific cases where the victim's death was the result of brutal physical abuse. There were several cases found but only few are famous while many others are not even known as a result of the media's deliberate lack of exposure. Our search for information was partly motivated by a keen desire to know why the judicial system through its representatives is so disproportional in leniency towards the criminal perpetrators of horrific crimes against innocent children. The findings were stunning. Our opinion is that judges, prosecutors, parole officers, psychiatrists, and the rest of flunkies that make up the entire judicial system, don't necessarily act according to laws when making decisions on shocking cases of extreme gravity; their premeditated decisions obey rather to influential external elements whose interests are outside the scope of anything related to justice, or the strict applicability of laws based on the hard facts of a particular case. The "external elements" are the elite controllers of society --mostly Jews-- who trace the lines according to their own class interest that all government functionaries must follow obediently in any official decision making process. The traces are hidden from the public for if they knew them explanations and answers would surface on the irrational, illogical, and nonsensical decisions made by judges in total contradiction with common sense and/or intelligence in cases where the hard facts and evidence overwhelm all arguments. The public is only allowed to know the official legitimized decision but not the true reason for the incomprehensible inconsistency between the case and reality. The case that fits into this description of judicial aberration with precision in view of the fanatical official exaggeration to protect criminals with privileges, despite the extremely grisly and gruesome nature of the case, is the one related to James Bulger. That case and few others are famous while many others are not. The cases below show consistent official pattern to protect the interest of criminals and the provision of leniency which amount to mere reprimands disproportionably with the monstrosity of the crimes.

Sarah Payne

Sarah Evelyn Isobel Payne [1991-2000] was eight years old when she was kidnapped, raped and murdered by convicted thief and paedophile Roy Whiting. Her tragic death became a high profile murder case in the contemporary criminal history of the United Kingdom. Sarah Payne disappeared on July 1, 2000 from an area near by her grandparent's home in West Sussex where she had been playing with her older brother and sister.

A nationwide search for her was commenced and her parents made television appeals for her safe return. On July 17, 2000 her naked body was found in a field fifteen miles from where she had disappeared two weeks earlier. The following day a forensic science test confirmed that it was in fact Sarah Payne and a murder investigation began. She was suffocated to death and her body dumped in the field after being raped.

Roy William Whiting was questioned about the disappearance and death of Sarah Payne as he was in the sex offenders register with a paedophile background and previous child rapist convictions. On December 12, 2001 he was convicted of the abduction, rape and murder of Sarah Payne and sentenced to life in prison. The case is particularly notable for the extensive use of forensic sciences in establishing the prosecution case against Whiting and his conviction for the sick and heinous crime he committed against an innocent little girl.

On November 24, 2002 home secretary David Blunkett made a landmark ruling ordering Roy Whiting to serve a minimum of 50 years in prison which would make him ineligible for parole until 2051 when he would be 92 years old. Shortly after the ruling was made, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favour of Anthony Anderson, another convicted murderer, who was challenging the right of politicians to decide how long a murderer must spend in prison before being considered for parole. Meanwhile, in June 2004 it was confirmed that Roy Whiting would be applying to the Court of Appeals for a new minimum term to be set arguing that David Blunkett's ruling was "disproportionate," and on June 9, 2010 his appeal resulted in his 50-year prison term being reduced ten years in a decision by a High Court judge. He is now serving a 40-year minimum term which will keep him in prison until at least 2041 at age 82. However, the murderer of Sarah Payne could be let out even earlier if he is moved from a maximum security prison to an open one before his release date. Critics of the "justice" system estimate that "loopholes" in the judicial system will eventually be used to let him walk the streets again while knowing that Whiting is very likely to commit additional crimes against children. His appeal and trial is estimated to have cost taxpayers 500 thousand pounds compared to the 11 thousand "compensation" given to the parents of Sarah Payne by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. Is this how much the life of an innocent little girl is worth to the "justice" system? Roy William Whiting is a two-leg sick animal and monster who should NEVER again be let out of prison alive no matter how old he may be. He must die where he is but if for any reason he is let out of prison alive we the people have the right to do Our Own Justice to protect our children from him. If released from prison he will murder another little girl again.

It is clear that the administrators of this nonsense judicial system deliberately fail to protect society from animals like Roy Whiting in order to comply with directives created by those in control to whom they are subordinated. Roy Whiting forfeited his right to live --except in an isolated prison cell for the rest of his natural life-- when he raped and murder an innocent little girl and must pay according to his crime, even if death isn't enough punishment for him. Whiting manipulates the farcical judicial system from prison knowing that it can be used to his advantage in helping him get out to continuing perpetrating horrific crimes against innocent children.

James Bulger

James Patrick Bulger [March 16, 1990 to February 12, 1993] was a two-year old British boy who was abducted, tortured and murdered by Jon Venables and Robert Thomson both age 10 at the time in Liverpool, England.

On February 12, 1993 Mrs. Denis Bulger [now Fergus] and her son James were at a shopping centre in Liverpool where Jon Venables and Robert Thompson who were both age 10 at the time, abducted James Bulger and took him to a railway line where they tortured and hit him with an iron bar on the head until his skull was fractured in ten different parts. He was also sexually abused and blue paint was thrown on his face. After murdering James Bulger the two boys laid his mutilated body on the railway tracks and the corpse was cut in half by a passing train. The remains of James Bulger were found on February 14, 1993. Jon Venables and Robert Thompson were subsequently arrested and convicted of his murder on November 24, 1993 and sentenced to "custody" due to their age until their release in 2001 with full official protection, economic assistance, and new identity. Robert Thompson became a fag and now lives somewhere in Northern England with his lover.

This case dramatically shows the grotesque and repugnant official commitment to protect criminals who perpetrate extremely gruesome crimes against innocent children, for no other reason than evil and perversion or both combined. The extent of official complacency of their own policy to protect criminal savagery in this case, has numbed the mind in any endeavour to shed understanding on the irrationality of continuously refusing to impose the appropriate punishment according to the nature and facts of the case. Instead, officials are only interested in protecting the criminals by hiding their identities and making efforts to keep them out of prison, particularly in the case of murderer Jon Venables.

This paedophile and perverted murderer of James Bulger has received not only an excessive amount of leniency despite the monstrosity of his crime, but also a favourable treatment while in prison, personal protection, material help, and even official compassion as a reward for his horrendous crime. Maggie Atkinson, a former commissioner, described the savage murder of James Bulger only as "exceptionally unpleasant" and declared on more than one occasion that "it was wrong to triad the boys in adult court." Where else could these savage killers have been tried at? They committed a horrible and premeditated crime of murder regardless of their age at the time and should have been treated and punished accordingly instead of giving them consideration and leniency. And to add even more insult to the memory of James Bugler and additional pain to his family, former High Court official Baroness Butler-Sloss who gladly granted lifelong anonymity to killer Jon Venables, said during an interview with the Daily Mail that "the public should be more merciful to child killers." [See the Daily Mail of March 15, 2010] What precisely is she telling us? You must be able to read between the lines of her nonsense statement. Will you be "merciful" to someone who savagely murders your son or daughter? What she is telling us between the lines is that society should accept the crime of murdering innocent children as "normal."

The disproportionate official fanfare when in 2001 the killers of James Bulger were released from jail after serving only eight short years for a crime worthy of imposing no less than a life sentence without parole in normal prison conditions --and not with any special privileges as in the case of these killers-- was recently shattered by the arrest and conviction of Jon Venebles after his own guilty plea to paedophile-related charges which involved copying hard core child pornography from Internet sources. This additional episode in the life of this pathetic criminal exposes even more than before the true nature of his deranged psychical condition, in reminisce to the sexual aspect of James Bulger murder as his corpse was found naked, a fact suggesting foul play before his tragic death. It is also an indication that Jon Venebles is a paedophile pervert with homosexual proclivities considering that the pornographic material he was in possession of involved only young boys. For this additional crime and the breaching of parole conditions he received only two years not likely to be served entirely, as talks about giving him another chance to get out with a new false identity is gaining momentum, in a prelude to anticipate his release while the original crime remains unpunished and justice is denied to James Bulger as the victim and his grieving family, particularly his mother, Mrs. Denise Fergus.

The killers of James Bulger have no future other than face the consequences of their own criminal actions soon or later at a time and place dictated by objective reality. The nature of the case and what has been done to deny the truth and justice, run against all principles established by the natural order created to regulate human existence and conduct. This has nothing to do with laws or judicial decisions made by anyone. Regardless of what officials do to protect the killers of James Bulger, in particular Jon Venebles, they will not be able to prevent what will happen one day as a matter of natural course. The killers of James Bulger should be either in prison for the rest of their lives or death.

Conclusion

The above cases became famously known in a multitude of others too numerous to mention here that weren't even given proper exposure but deserve full consideration as well, as they are additional proof that defending and protecting the interest of criminals, is the priority of officials who manage the current judicial system on behalf of those to whom they are obediently subordinated. There is simply no other logical way to explain the absolute nonsense the present judicial system truly is and where the root of its current existing form can be found. Nothing happens without somebody planning and designing the course of something to produce an effect according to an original plan, and in the case of hard-core criminals getting benefits, protection, consideration, compassion, and even forgiveness for their monstrous crimes against innocent children, there is no exception. The people who were chosen to implement the policies traced by those who allowed them to be where they are on condition that they do as were told, are the culprit to point the finger at for what is currently happening in society now. They are acting on behalf of those to whom they are subordinated to protect their interest and not the interest of innocent children and decent citizens. This is why things are the way they are and nothing works. So within the context of this reality, common people have the absolute right to do whatever they must to protect themselves and their families against the criminals this system is protecting. Hence, the logical approach to this situation is to first seek unity among common people, organize, and act according to objective reality always keeping in mind that whatever is done it will be to do Our Own Justice, since we can not believe nor depend on this system at all. All murderers of innocent children must stay in prison until death or be executed if released. Our mailing address is: our-own-justice@post.com

Justice for Baby Peter [Peter Connelly]

2010-02-27T07:21:00.000-08:00

Our Own Justice

This blog is dedicated to the memory of Peter Connelly [Baby Peter] with life and love this system denied him through those who savagely tortured and murder him senselessly

Background of a tragedy

Peter Connelly [2006-2007] who first became known as "Baby P" and later as "Baby Peter" due to so-called "legal reasons," was a beautiful little boy who die on August 3, 2007 as a result of severe torture inflicted on him by his mother's lover Steven Barker and his brother Jason at a dwelling in London. Peter was subjected to extremely cruel torture sessions that lasted hours and for a period of at least eight months continuously until he succumbed to the cruelty of his sick tyrannical torturers. The physical damage caused by the savage torture he suffered for long months included a broken back, at least eight broken ribs, finger nails pulled with pliers, severe beatings, knocking off his teeth by fist blows so hard that he swallow them, and more sick brutality than any 17-month baby can endure for too long. While the horrific torture was being perpetrated on little Peter, official employees from the social service system responsible for the protection of children, callously and indifferently ignored the signs signalling what Peter was going through at the hands of his executioners. Peter's biological mother, Tracey Connelly, cover up the truth to help his killers from being discovered and their horrendous crimes against Peter from becoming exposed to official social service agents during routine visits to the house. The killers of Peter were eventually arrested, tried and convicted, but the sentences given to them were too lenient considering the size and monstrously of their crimes. And to add even more callous disregard for the tragic end of little Peter, the judicial officialdom is now preparing to give his killers protection and special treatment after their release from prison. This brief summary background on this terrible tragedy give you basic information to know who is responsible for the death of Peter Connelly and how he was murdered. What you need to know next is why he was tortured and murder in such ways. If you wish more detailed information and want to see pictures of his killers, visit www.dailymail.co.uk or http://news.sky.com which have covered the subject in great detail. The pictures of those responsible for his death will not be published on this blog.

The scum who tortured and murdered Peter Connelly

Steven Barker, a sick convicted rapist of baby girls, paedophile, and now a killer of an innocent child, is the one who actually did most of the torturing and final murder of Peter Connelly. His brother Jason tortured little Peter too but mostly helped the other beast with the torturing. This worthless piece of shit is also a sick convicted paedophile and a child rapist who has openly declared to enjoy his depraved and sadistic deeds against innocent children. He has served time in prison before for his crimes and is well known to the police. Both of this scum have a long rap sheet of violent and heinous crimes against innocent children going back many years. Meanwhile, not enough information has been obtained yet on the family and/or personal background of that detestable piece of shit named Steven Barker, but considering the contents on some of the articles published in different Internet media sources, he is an individual with mental deliriums that make him hallucinate deluding thoughts of grandeur by possessing "power" over others. He is fascinated with the Nazi ideology which he combines with his sick and perverted dementia condition and it is the mix of these and other nonsense, what motivates him to seek victims on whom he can practice his stupid deliriums with violent and sick excitement. After he moved into the house where little Peter lived with his biological mother, he focused on him and thus begun his tragically fate we are now mourning. This is the scum officials are now talking about giving them false identities and protection after they get out of prison. We must not let these animals get away with their horrendous crimes without paying what they owe to Peter. Tracey Connelly, whose maiden last name is Cox, is an almost illiterate and sex-obsessed disgusting slob with a disastrous broken family background. She is definitely unfit to be a mother and should be sterilised. Despite being the one who covered up her beast lover so that the torturing of her son would not be discovered, nowadays she tells friends in letters about her future plans to "have fun" and "party" when she comes out of jail. She totally disregards her direct responsibility in the tragic death of her son Peter as a result of savage torture. She could be out of jail in only three years and there is not a reason to think that she won't do it again. If you wish to have more details on the contents of her deranged writings, the Daily Mail of London published a series of articles with pictures related to Peter which include his mother's family background and her attitude towards the sad tragedy suffered by little Peter. Photographs of her and the other scum responsible for the death of Peter are also shown. The address is: www.dailymail.co.uk

A social system managed by and for criminals

The case of Peter Connelly is not the only one and too many other innocent children have die and continue dying as a result of severe mistreatment or cruel abuse by adults. The case of 2-year old girl Sanam Nausarka, James Bulger, and Sarah Payne are also of great significance. What makes Peter's case so unique is the sheer brutality and fashion by which he was savagely tortured until death. But what is even more exceptional on this senseless tragic outcome, is the role played by the so-called "authorities" from the social services responsible for the protection of children, who grossly and deliberately failed to take the appropriate action that could have saved Peter and Sanam from death. The house where Peter was living with his natural mother and those who tortured and killed him, was inspected sixty times by social service agents who knew or at least suspected what was going on, but did not want to take any action to save him from the great danger he was in. Even a woman Doctor who examined him closely refused to acknowledge and report his injuries during visits at the house. What does all of this and more tell us? We don't know how you may see it, but it is obvious that all those who were representing the officialdom where protecting the criminals who were committing monstrous crimes of cruel and savage torture against a 17-month old baby. It is within the context of these facts and the media exposure, that Peter's case was unique and unprecedented in Britain and beyond, and his case is now a symbol to remind us of the type of society we are living in. The present reality of society was designed to promote crime since criminals found it and currently control and manage it. Those who think of politicians as "our leaders" are not in reality "leaders" nor do they represent "our" interests as citizens; all members of government are merely managers of interests belonging to the elite class who wield the real power, and it is according to their interest that this society is managed by all those in government for whom we vote like sheep. The laws are made according to designs conceived and created by the elite who are hard core criminals themselves, and are enforced through the so-called "justice" system in which judges are praised as the ultimate symbol of "law enforcement." They have full authorisation to manipulate the laws and do so in ways according to the circumstances of a particular case, and the desired social effect they seek by their decisions made in line with the interests the judge truly represents. The mere nature of Peter's case is so monstrous and repugnant that it steers deep feelings of rage and disgust at the leniency by the judge sentencing his killers to what amounts to a mere reprimand. The sick killers of Peter should have been sentenced to natural life in prison without any possibility for parole and in harsh conditions. Thousands of people were and continue to be outraged by the gross injustice against Peter but instead officials talk now about parole and protection for his killers by given them false identification and economic assistance after releasing them from prison. If these facts are not enough for you to believe this system promotes crime on behalf of criminals, than you must be either very naive or part of a problem that is destroying the life of too many innocent children. We think it is time for common people to make Our Own Justice and punish criminals according to their crimes. In the case of Peter killers, they forfeited their right to live when they murdered him and must pay for their crimes according to Our Own Justice. We can't trust or depend on this "justice" system anymore simply because there won't be any real justice for victims like Peter and others. This system protects only the interest of the elite minority whose employees are those in government falsely claiming to represent us the majority. The criminals who run this society do not want monsters like Peter killers in prison because it is contrary to their plans for a totalitarian government; they want them on the streets so they can continue committing heinous crimes and create thereby, unbeatable conditions in society to the point where common people start demanding more control, and then create repressive laws. How else can you explain the nonsense and illogical actions of puppet judges who release from prison animals who torture and murder innocent kids? Their actions are well premeditated and according to specific purposes related to a desired social effect, and not because they are applying the law in strict terms. They are criminals promoting crime on behalf of much bigger criminals to whom they are subordinated.

About this blog

This blog is a very sincere gesture of unconditional solidarity with a beautiful and innocent little boy to whom this system denied him the right to live, love, and justice even after his tragic death. It is also intended to promote communication to exchange information related to Peter killers and other cases where innocent children were or are being abused by anyone. We need information that would allow us to make plans for subsequent direct action on anyone responsible for crimes against children and other innocent people. We are particularly interested in having contacts with journalists who may obtain information on the movements or location of Peter killers. We think that some monitoring of these criminals can help us when tracking them becomes necessary. When and where if they are released from prison, we would want to know as soon as possible and journalists might have access to this type of information. If you have information on anyone who plans to commit or has already committed a crime against a child, or any unprovoked crimes on innocent people, send mail to us instead of calling the police. We hope to count on you. Our address is: our-own-justice@mail.com

Pass on this information by telling your family and friends about this blog. If we are united we can be strong and survive.